Selected Research Resources July 2026
1 – The Construction of Queer Masculinities
2 – The Construction of Post-Digital Queer Identities
3 – Platformisation, Data Capitalism and the Political Economies of Technology
4 – Artificial Intelligence, Proxies, Statistical Abstraction, Power and Capital Accumulation: Perspectives from Critical AI Studies
5 – Digital Intimacies, Sexual Economies and the Centrality of the Sex Industry to Technological Development
6 – Branding, Consumer Culture and the Construction of Identity under Neoliberalism
7 – Behavioural Economics, Choice Architecture and Interface Design (UI/UX)
8 – Genetics, Memetics and the Computational Quantification of Beauty, Desire and Desirability
9 – Fashioned Bodies: Sculptable Subjectivities, Editable Identities and the Fragmentation of the Self
10 – More-than-Human Studies, Posthumanism and the Post-Anthropocene
11 – Architectural Mapping, Computational Design, Parametricism, Contestable Design and Speculative Design
1 – The Construction of Queer Masculinities (8)
Berry, K. (2007) ‘Embracing the Catastrophe: Gay Body Seeks Acceptance’, Qualitative Inquiry, 13(2), pp. 259–281.
Butler, J. (1990). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. In S.-E. Case (Ed.), Performing feminisms: Feminist critical theory and theatre (pp. 270-292). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Cole, S. (2000) Don We Now Our Gay Apparel: Gay Men’s Dress in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Berg.
Cole, S. (2023) Gay Men’s Style: Fashion, Dress and Sexuality in the 21st Century. London: Bloomsbury.
Connell, R.W. (2005) Masculinities. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Downs, A. (2005) The Velvet Rage: Overcoming the Pain of Growing Up Gay in a Straight Man's World. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Lifelong Books.
McGlynn, N. (2024) Bodies and Boundaries of UK Bear Spaces. London: Routledge.
Todd, M. (2018) Straight Jacket: Overcoming Society's Legacy of Gay Shame. London: Black Swan.
2 – The Construction of Post-Digital Queer Identities (15)
Florêncio, J. (2021) ‘Chemsex Cultures: Subcultural Reproduction and Queer Survival’, Sexualities, 26(5–6), pp. 556–573. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460720986922.
Gieben, B.E. (2025) Crisis Masculinity Part 6: All Men, Me Too: We shape male identity with shame... and wonder why society is so shameful, and men so shameless. Strange Exiles. Available at: https://strangeexiles.substack.com/p/crisis-masculinity-part-6-all-men (Accessed: 29 June 2026).
Gieben, B.E. (2025) Crisis Masculinity Part 9: The Recovery Myth. Strange Exiles. Available at: https://strangeexiles.substack.com/p/crisis-masculinity-part-9-the-recovery (Accessed: 29 June 2026).
Hakim, J. (2019) Work That Body: Male Bodies in Digital Culture. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Hakim, J. (2018) ‘The spornosexual: the affective contradictions of male body-work in neoliberal digital culture’. Journal of Gender Studies, 27(2), pp. 231–241. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2016.1217771
Harway, D. (1985) ‘A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century’, Socialist Review, 80, pp. 65–108.
Light, B., Fletcher, G. and Adam, A. (2008) ‘Gay Men, Gaydar and the Commodification of Difference’, Information Technology & People, 21(3), pp. 300–314. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840810896046.
McGlotten, S. (2013) Virtual Intimacies: Media, Affect, and Queer Sociality. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Møller, K. (2020) ‘Hanging, Blowing, Slamming, and Playing: Erotic Control and Overflow in a Digital Chemsex Scene’, Sexualities, 23(8), pp. 909–925. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460720964100.
Mowlabocus, S. (2010) Gaydar Culture: Gay Men, Technology and Embodiment in the Digital Age. Farnham: Ashgate.
Ng, E. (2013) ‘A “Post-Gay” Era? Media Gaystreaming, Homonormativity, and the Politics of LGBT Integration’, Communication, Culture & Critique, 6(2), pp. 258–283.
Osserman, J. (2024) ‘A Psychoanalytic Reconsideration of Chemsex and Anti-Retroviral Time: Or, It’s G O’Clock’, Body & Society, 30(1), pp. 1–25. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X241298153.
Pachankis, J.E., Clark, K.A., Burton, C.L., Hughto, J.M.W., Bränström, R. and Keene, D.E. (2020) ‘Sex, status, competition, and exclusion: Intraminority stress from within the gay community and gay and bisexual men's mental health’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(3), pp. 713–740.
Penney, T. (2014) ‘Bodies under Glass: Gay Dating Apps and the Affect-Image’, Media International Australia, 153(1), pp. 107–117. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1415300113
Svensson, M.E.D. (2019) Emerging Adults and Emerging Sexualities: Identity, Health, Stress and Resilience of Pansexual, Queer and Bisexual Individuals. Upgrade submission. Thomas Coram Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education.
3 – Platformisation, Data Capitalism and the Political Economies of Technology (15)
Bucher, T. (2012) ‘Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook’, New Media & Society, 14(7), pp. 1164–1180.
Dev, S., Li, T. and Phillips, J. (2021) ‘Harms of Gender Exclusivity and Underrepresentation in Language Technologies’, Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). Available at: https://aclanthology.org/2021.emnlp-main.150.pdf.
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (2022) LGBTIQ Equality Strategy 2020–2025: Tackling Discrimination in the Digital Era. Available at: https://fra.europa.eu.
Gillespie, T. (2010) ‘The Politics of "Platforms"’, New Media & Society, 12(3), pp. 347–364. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738.
Golumbia, D. (2024) Cyberlibertarianism: The Right-Wing Politics of Digital Technology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Grindr Inc. (2026) Grindr Inc. Delivers 28% Full Year 2025 Revenue Growth, 26 February. Available at: https://investors.grindr.com/news/news-details/2026/Grindr-Inc--Delivers-28-Full-Year-2025-Revenue-Growth/(Accessed: 16 April 2026).
Haber, B. (2016) ‘The Queer Ontology of Digital Method’, Women’s Studies Quarterly, 44(3–4), pp. 150–169. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/44474067.
Lury, C., Viney, W. and Wark, S. (eds.) (2022) Figure: Concept and Method. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
Monroe, D. (2023) ‘ChatGPT: Super Rentier’, Computational Impacts, 20 January. Available at: https://monroelab.com/2023/01/20/super-rentier (Accessed: 20 June 2026).
Nieborg, D. and Poell, T. (2018) ‘The Platformization of Cultural Production: Theorizing the Contingent Cultural Commodity’, New Media & Society, 20(11), pp. 4275–4292. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769694.
Parker, A. (2026) ‘Grindr Is Testing a Premium AI Tier With a $500 Monthly Price Tag’, Them, 5 February. Available at: https://www.them.us/story/grindr-premium-ai-tier-500-monthly-price-tag (Accessed: 21 April 2026).
Peacock, S.E. (2014) ‘How web tracking changes user agency in the age of Big Data: The used user’, Big Data & Society, July–December, pp. 1–11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714564228.
Rosamond, E. (2017) ‘To Sort, to Match and to Share: Addressivity in Online Dating Platforms’, Journal of Aesthetics & Culture.
Rosamond, E. (2023) ‘YouTube Personalities as Infrastructure: The Assetisation of Identity in Social Media Logic’, Culture Machine, 19(1). Available at: http://culturemachine.net/vol-19-2018-the-infrastructure-of-identity/youtube-personalities-as-infrastructure/.
Zuboff, S. (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile Books.
4 – Artificial Intelligence, Proxies, Statistical Abstraction, Power and Capital Accumulation: Perspectives from Critical AI Studies (18)
Benjamin, R. (2019) Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bresnihan, P. and Brodie, P. (2025) From the Bog to the Cloud: Dependency and Eco-Modernity in Ireland. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Crawford, K. (2021) Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. New Haven: Yale University Press
Lupton, D. (2016) The Quantified Self: A Sociology of Self-Tracking. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Lalwani, A. (2025) ‘Grindr Shareholders Propose $3.46 Billion Deal to Take the App Private and Give Greater Control of Platform’, Gayety, 28 October. Available at: https://gayety.com/grindr-shareholders-propose-private-dea0MjU5MDQwKANjbG4A&utm_source=ig_text_feed__timeline (Accessed: 28 October 2025).
Mansouri, M.I. and Bailey, D. (2025) ‘How to Be "Anti-AI" in the 21st Century: Overcoming the Inevitability Narrative’, Global Political Economy. Advance online publication. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1332/26352257Y2025D000000030.
McQuillan, D. (2022) Resisting AI: An Anti-fascist Approach to Artificial Intelligence. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
McQuillan, D. (2021) ‘Post-Humanism, Mutual Aid’, in Verdegem, P. (ed.) AI for Everyone? Critical Perspectives. London: University of Westminster Press, pp. 67–83. Available at: https://doi.org/10.16997/book55.e.
McQuillan, D. (2023) ‘ChatGPT Is a Bullshit Generator Waging Class War’, Vice, 9 February. Available at: https://www.vice.com/en/article/chatgpt-is-a-bullshit-generator-waging-class-war/ (Accessed: 28 October 2025).
MIT Technology Review (2022) ‘China just announced a new social credit law. Here’s what it means’. MIT Technology Review, 22 November. Available at: https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/11/22/1063605/china-announced-a-new-social-credit-law-what-does-it-mean (Accessed: 15 July 2025).
Moore, P.V. (2025) ‘Artificial Intelligence Policy Observatory for the World of Work’, Global Political Economy, 4(2), pp. 195–202.
Pasquinelli, M. and Joler, V. (2021) ‘The Nooscope manifested: AI as instrument of knowledge extractivism’, Interface Critique, 3, pp. 37–68. Available at: https://doi.org/10.11588/ic.2021.3.81326
Reuters (2025) ‘Is Today’s AI Boom Bigger than the Dotcom Bubble?’, Reuters, 22 July. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/is-todays-ai-boom-bigger-than-dotcom-bubble-2025-07-22/ (Accessed: 21 June 2026).
Velkova, J. and Plantin, J.-C. (2023) ‘Data centers and the infrastructural temporalities of digital media: An introduction’, New Media & Society, 25(2), pp. 273–286. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221149945
Verdegem, P. (2021) AI for Every one? Critical Perspectives. Pp. 67–83. London: University of Westminster Press.
Wall Street Journal (2026) ‘One Thing I’m Watching: The AI-Fication of the S&P 500’, The Wall Street Journal, 1 June. Available at: https://www.wsj.com (Accessed: 21 June 2026).
Wolfe Herd, W. (2024) Bumble’s Herd on the Next Chapter of Growth. [Video]. YouTube. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y95T58DSREU (Accessed: 2 September 2025).
5 – Digital Intimacies, Sexual Economies, Dating Apps and the Centrality of the Sex Industry to Technological Development (17)
Bergström, M. (2021) The New Laws of Love: Online Dating and the Privatization of Intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Birhane, A., Prabhu, V.U. and Kahembwe, E. (2021) ‘Multimodal Datasets: Misogyny, Pornography, and Malignant Stereotypes’. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.01963 (Accessed: 17 February 2026).
Brunning, L. (2024) Romantic Agency: Loving Well in Modern Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bryant, T.D. (2022) ‘The Experiences of Undergraduate Black Gay Men Who Use Hookup and Dating Apps While Attending a Predominantly White Institution’. PhD thesis. Rowan University. Available at: https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/2968.
Cabañes, J.V.A. and Uy-Tioco, C.S. (2022) ‘Glocal Intimacies: Theorizing Mobile Media and Intimate Relationships’, Communication, Culture & Critique, 15(4), pp. 463–470. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcac030.
Chan, L.S., Cassidy, E. and Rosenberger, J.G. (2021) ‘Mobile Dating Apps and Racial Preferencing Insights: Exploring Self-Reported Racial Preferences and Behavioral Racial Preferences among Gay Men Using Jack’d’, International Journal of Communication, 15, pp. 3928–3947. Available at: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/16730.
Nader, K. (2025). The gamification of dating online. Theoria, 91(3), e12549. https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12549
Next Move Strategy Consulting (2026) Dating App Market Size and Share Analysis | 2026–2035. Available at: https://www.nextmsc.com/report/dating-app-market-ic4017 (Accessed: 20 June 2026).
Paul, A. and Ahmed, S. (2023) ‘Computed Compatibility: Examining User Perceptions of AI and Matchmaking Algorithms’, Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(7), pp. 1002–1015. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2196579.
Pidoux, J. (2023). A comparative study of algorithmic–user classification practices in online dating: A human–machine learning process. Porn Studies, 10(2), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2022.2104352
Roach, T. (2021) Screen Love: Queer Intimacies in the Grindr Era. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Rodriguez, M. (2026) ‘Grindr Is Testing a Premium AI Tier With a $500 Monthly Price Tag: The Move Is Part of the App’s Plans to Become “An AI-First Company”’, Them, 5 February. Available at: https://www.them.us/story/grindr-premium-ai-tier-500-monthly-price-tag (Accessed: 17 February 2026).
Rosenfeld, M.J., Thomas, R.J. and Hausen, S. (2019) ‘Disintermediating Your Friends: How Online Dating in the United States Displaces Other Ways of Meeting’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(36), pp. 17753–17758. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908630116.
Stebbings, H. (2024) ‘George Arison, Grindr CEO: How Grindr Built a Free Flow Machine’, YouTube, 4 December. Available at: https://youtu.be/sndiM3mPPN4 (Accessed: 21 April 2026).
Szulc, Ł. (2025) ‘Sad Dating Apps: Emotional technological determinism and agency in late modernity’, Social Media + Society, 11(4), pp. 1–11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251380042
Watney, S. (1987) Policing Desire: Pornography, AIDS and the Media. London: Comedia.
6 – Branding, Consumer Culture and the Construction of Identity under Neoliberalism (17)
Anderson, C. (2006) The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More. New York: Hyperion.
Arvidsson, A. (2005) ‘Brands: A Critical Perspective’, Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(2), pp. 235–258.
Arvidsson, A. (2006) Brands: Meaning and Value in Media Culture. London: Routledge.
Basar, S., Coupland, D. and Obrist, H.U. (2015) The Age of Earthquakes: A Guide to the Extreme Present. London: Penguin.
Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Translated by R. Nice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Foucault, M. (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. Edited by M. Senellart. Translated by G. Burchell. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hearn, A. (2008) ‘"Meat, Mask, Burden": Probing the Contours of the Branded "Self"’, Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(2), pp. 197–217.
Hui, Y. (2012) ‘What is a digital object?’, Metaphilosophy, 43(4), pp. 380–395. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01777.x
Jarzombek, M. (2016) Digital Stockholm Syndrome in the Post-Ontological Age. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Jarzombek, M. (2020) The Data Human: Who Are We? Exploring the Questions of Our Identity in the Digital Age. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lupton, D. (2016) The Quantified Self: A Sociology of Self-Tracking. Cambridge: Polity Press.
McLuhan, M. and Fiore, Q. (2008) The Medium Is the Massage. London: Penguin Books.
Preciado, P.B. (2013) Testo Junkie: Sex, Drugs and Biopolitics in the Pharmacopornographic Era. New York: The Feminist Press.
Rosamond, E. (2016) Economies of Character (or, Character in the Age of Big Data). PhD thesis. Goldsmiths, University of London.
Sysalova, Y. (2021) Digital Mass Culture: Me, My Self and My Selfie. Athens.
Veblen, T. (1899) The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. New York: Macmillan.
Wark, S. (2017) ‘Correlating Race: On Machine Learning and Digital Culture’. University of Warwick. Available at: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/cim/events/researchforum.
7 – Behavioural Economics, Choice Architecture and Interface Design (UI/UX) (9)
Coffey, J., Kanai, A., Dobson, A.S., Gill, R. and White, N. (2025) ‘Hang on, why am I editing my photos?’ Disrupting the virtual gaze through self-editing workshops’, Qualitative Research, pp. 1–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941251341994.
Gill, R. (2023) Perfect: Feeling Judged on Social Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Grindr Inc. (2026) ‘2026 Product Roadmap: Powered by gAI™’, Grindr, 16 March. Available at: https://www.grindr.com/2026-product-roadmap (Accessed: 21 April 2026).
Manovich, L. (2020) Cultural Analytics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mears, A. (2023) ‘Bringing Bourdieu to a content farm: Social media production fields and the cultural economy of attention’, Social Media + Society, 9(3), pp. 1–12.
Miller, G. (2009) Spent: Sex, Evolution and the Secrets of Consumerism. London: William Heinemann
Sysalova, Y. (2021) Digital Mass Culture: Me, My Self and My Selfie. Athens.
Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R. (2021) Nudge: The Final Edition. London: Allen Lane.
Vigfússon, G. (1860) Galdrakver (Huld Manuscript). Reykjavík: Landsbókasafn Íslands – Háskólabókasafn.
8 – Genetics, Memetics and the Computational Quantification of Beauty, Desire and Desirability (10)
Berger, J. (1972) Ways of Seeing. London: British Broadcasting Corporation and Penguin Books.
Dawkins, R. (1976) The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Duster, T. (2003) Backdoor to Eugenics: The Genetic Determinism of Social Behaviour. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
Golding, J. (2014) ‘Ecce Homo Sexual: Ontology and Eros in the Age of Incompleteness and Entanglement’, Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 19(2), pp. 217–230. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2014.950641
Hakim, C. (2011) Honey Money: The Power of Erotic Capital. London: Allen Lane.
Madureira, M. (2018) ‘Me, Myself and I: Self-Fetishisation in the Age of the Selfie’, Open Cultural Studies, 2(1), pp. 363–373. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2018-0033.
Miller, G. (2000) The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature. London: William Heinemann.
Ouellette, J. (2014) Me, Myself and Why: Searching for the Science of Self. New York: Penguin Books.
Wiener, N. (1948) Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Yuran, N. (2024) The Sexual Economy of Capitalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9 – Fashioned Bodies: Sculptable Subjectivities, Editable Identities and the Fragmentation of the Self (12)
Bamford, S. and Danaher, J. (2017) ‘Transfer of personality to a synthetic human (“mind uploading”) and the social construction of identity’, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 24(11–12)
Barthes, R. (1990) The Fashion System. Translated by M. Ward and R. Howard. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Castiglione, B. (1528) Il Libro del Cortegiano (The Book of the Courtier). Venice: Aldus.
Demna, G. (2025) ‘Oversized silhouettes and padded shoulders define the Balenciaga aesthetic under Demna Gvasalia’. Vogue Business, 24 June. Available at: https://www.voguebusiness.com/fashion/oversized-silhouettes-and-padded-shoulders-define-the-balenciaga-aesthetic-under-demna-gvasalia
Entwistle, J. (2015) The Fashioned Body: Fashion, Dress and Modern Social Theory. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Geczy, A. and Karaminas, V. (eds.) (2017) The End of Fashion: Clothing and Dress in the Age of Globalization. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.
Mair, C. (2018) The Psychology of Fashion. Abingdon: Routledge.
Kelly, D. (2021) ‘A Virtual Gucci Bag Sold For More Money on Roblox Than The Actual Bag’, Hypebeast, 26 May. Available at: https://hypebeast.com/2021/5/virtual-gucci-bag-roblox-resale (Accessed: 30 June 2026).
Vainshtein, O. (2019) ‘Photography and the body’, in Geczy, A. and Karaminas, V. (eds.) The End of Fashion: Clothing and Dress in the Age of Globalization. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 47–65.
Townsend, K., Solomon, R. and Briggs-Goode, A. (eds.) (2020) Crafting Anatomies: Archives, Dialogues, Fabrications. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Vita-More, N. (1983) The Transhuman Manifesto. Available at: https://www.humanityplus.org/the-transhumanist-manifesto (Accessed: 30 June 2026).
10 – More-than-Human Studies, Posthumanism and the Post-Anthropocene (5)
Haraway, D. (1985), A Cyborg Manifesto, University of Minnesota Press.
Hayles, N.K. (2008) How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Sehgal, M. and Wilkie, A. (eds.) (2025) More-Than-Human Aesthetics: Venturing Beyond the Bifurcation of Nature. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Tironi, M., Chilet, M., Hermansen, P. and Marín, C. (eds.) (2023) Design for More-Than-Human Futures: Towards Post-Anthropocentric Worlding. Abingdon: Routledge.
Wilkie, A. and Michael, M. (2025) ‘The aesthetics of more-than-human design: Speculative energy briefs for the Chthulucene’, Human–Computer Interaction, 40(1–4), pp. 104–116. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2023.2276392.
11 – Architectural Mapping, Computational Design, Parametricism, Contestable Design and Speculative Design (11)
Bratton, B.H. (2016) ‘On Speculative Design’. DIS Magazine. Available at: https://dismagazine.com/discussion/81971/on-speculative-design-benjamin-h-bratton/ (Accessed: 30 June 2024).
Cook, P. (ed.) (1999) Archigram. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
Chung, S. (2022) Sougwen Chung: Ecologies of Becoming. Berlin: Hatje Cantz.
Dunne, A. and Raby, F. (2013) Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lee, Y. (2015) ‘The Parametric Design Genealogy of Zaha Hadid’, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 14(2), pp. 403–410. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.14.403
Light, B., Burgess, J. and Duguay, S. (2018) ‘The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps’, New Media & Society, 20(3), pp. 881–900. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675438
Manovich, L. (2014) Selfiexploratory: Selfie City. Investigating the style of self-portraits (selfies) in five cities across the world. Available at: https://selfiecity.net/selfiexploratory/ (Accessed: 30 June 2024).
McRae, L. (2018) Biometric Mirror: What if Artificial Intelligence gets it wrong? Available at: https://www.lucymcrae.net/biometric-mirror (Accessed: 30 June 2025).
Sadler, S. (2005) Archigram: Architecture without Architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schumacher, P. (2009) ‘Parametricism: A New Global Style for Architecture and Urban Design’, Architectural Design, 79(4), pp. 14–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.912
Spens, M. (2007) Future Systems. London: Phaidon.